The Judging of Jurgen by James Branch Cabell (1920)

New York Tribune Feb 8 1920
“The Judging of Jurgen” by James Branch Cabell
New York Tribune, Feb. 8, 1920, p.11.

On January 14, 1920, the New York Society for the Suppression of Vice seized the printing plates and copies of Cabell’s book Jurgen from publisher Robert M. McBride and Company on charges of obscenity. This short fable written by Cabell appeared in the New York Tribune, February 8, 1920. Bookfellows issued a bound version later in 1920 which included an acrostic poem at the end. The story was also reprinted in Jurgen and the Censor, and was eventually added to editions of Jurgen as well. James H. W. Althouse created a calligraphy copy which was part of Cabell’s personal library, now in the Cabell Room, VCU Libraries Special Collections and Archives.

As a note of context, a “tumblebug” is a dung beetle. In his story “The Roads Must Roll,” Robert Heinlein, a great Cabell fan, used “tumblebug” as a name for the self-balancing motorized unicycles used by maintenance workers.


The following is a transcription of Cabell’s piece in the New York Tribune.

Author of “Jurgen” Defends Himself Against the Philistines
The Judging of Jurgen
Great Tumblebug States His Case for the Court of Philistia

By James Branch Cabell

They of Poictesme narrate that in the old days a court was held by the Philistines to decide whether or no King Jurgen should be relegated to limbo. And when the judges were prepared for judging, there came into the court a great tumblebug, rolling in front of him his loved and properly housed young ones.

This insect looked at Jurgen, and its pincers rose erect in horror. And the bug cried to the three judges, “Now by St. Anthony! this Jurgen must forthwith be relegated to limbo, for he is offensive and lewd and lascivious and indecent.”

“And how can that be?” says Jurgen.

“You are lewd, because you carry a staff, which I prefer to think is not a staff.”

“You are offensive,” the bug replied, “because you carry a sword, which I choose to say is not a sword. You are lewd, because you carry a staff, which I prefer to think is not a staff. You are lascivious, because you carry a lance, which I elect to declare is not a lance. And finally, you are indecent for reasons of which a description would be objectionable to me, and which, therefore, I must decline to reveal to anybody.”

“Well, that sounds logical,” says Jurgen, “but, still, at the same time, it would be no worse for an admixture of common sense. For you, gentlemen, can see for yourselves, that I have here a sword and a lance and a staff, and no mention of anything else; and that all the lewdness is in the insectival mind of him who itches to be calling these things by other names.”

The judges said nothing as yet. But they that guarded Jurgen and all the other Philistines stood to this side and to that side with their eyes shut tight and saying in unison, “We decline to look, because to look might seem to imply a doubt of what the tumblebug has said. Besides, so long as the tumblebug has reasons which he declines to reveal, his reasons stay unanswerable, and you are plainly a prurient rascal, who are making trouble for yourself.”

“To the contrary,” says Jurgen, “I am a poet and I make literature.”

“But in Philistia to make literature and to make trouble for yourself are synonyms,” the tumblebug explained. “I know, for already we of Philistia have been pestered by three of these makers of literature. Yes, there was Edgar, whom I starved and hunted until I was tired of it; then I chased him up a back alley one night and knocked out those annoying brains of his. And there was Walt, whom I chivvied and battered from place to place and made a paralytic out of him; and him, too, I labeled offensive and lewd and lascivious and indecent. Then, later, there was Mark, whom I frightened into disguising himself in a clown’s suit, so that nobody might suspect him of being one of those vile makers of literature; indeed, I frightened him so that he hid away the greater part of what he had made until he was dead and I could not get at him. That was a disgusting trick to play on me, I consider. Still, these are the only three detected makers of literature that have ever infested Philistia, thanks be to goodness and my vigilance, but for both of which we might have been no more free from makers of literature than are the other countries.”

“What is art to me and my way of living?” replied the tumblebug, wearily.

“Nay, but these three,” cried Jurgen, “are the glories of Philistia; and of all that Philistia has produced, it is those three alone, whom living ye made least of, that to-day are honored wherever art is honored, and where nobody bothers one way or the other about Philistia!”

“What is art to me and my way of living?” replied the tumblebug, wearily. “I have no concern with art and letters and other lewd idols of foreign nations. I have in charge the moral welfare of my young, whom I roll here before me, and trust, with St. Anthony’s aid, to raise in time to be God-fearing tumblebugs like me. For the rest, I have never minded dead men being well spoken of; no, no, my lad, whatever I may do means nothing to you, and once you are really rotten you will find the tumblebug friendly enough. Meanwhile, I am paid to protest that living persons are offensive and lewd and lascivious and indecent, and one must live.”

Jurgen now looked more attentively at this queer creature; and he saw that the tumblebug was malodorous certainly, but at bottom honest and well meaning; and that seemed to Jurgen the saddest thing he had found among the Philistines. For the tumblebug was sincere in his insane doings and all Philistia honored him sincerely, so that there was nowhere any hope for this people.

Therefore, King Jurgen addressed himself to submit, as his need was, to the strange customs of the Philistines. “Now do you judge me fairly,” cried Jurgen to his judges, “if there be any justice in this insane country. And if there be none, do you relegate me to limbo, or to any other place, so long as in that place this tumblebug is not omnipotent and sincere and insane.”

And Jurgen waited ….


Banning Jurgen

PREVIOUS:  Jurgen and the New York Society for the Suppression of Vice

The Judging of Jurgen by James Branch Cabell (1920)

NEXT:  Jurgen: In the News (1922)

Jurgen Acquittal – October 19, 1922

Jurgen: After the Trial